pdt
09-28-2013, 05:01 PM
what is the opinion on here for using a better type of rubber for the top engine mounts on OMC triples ? or any other outboard engine
I know some people have gone to the extreme and fitted solid mounts, but this just puts the stresses on other places , I.E the transom etc.
some don't like the idea of the solid metal mounts causing gearbox failures due to stress cracks being caused by complete solid mounts too.
What if you were to use polyurethane bushes like those fitted to customised vehicles and off road extreme vehicles ?
The polybushes come in all different grades of stiffness from soft to almost solid as a rock and will last 10 times that of the omc/brp mounts.
Lots of the big customised inboard engine use the polyurethane due to it being so much better and long lasting.
The size of the bushes that will fit the OMC triple just happens to be a size that is very common all around the world, and very cheap !!!!!
salt water don't destroy the polyurethane they also don't mind the heat or extremes of pressure.
some of the benefits of this type of mount would be the resistance to petroleum fuels and hydrocarbon fuels ,its low compression set, good abrasion resistance
good tensile strength and high rigidity, good ozone and weather restance and even dry heat tolerance to over 100 degree C.
so would this not be an ideal application for high performance outboard engine mounts ?
the price of this type of mount is extremely cheap and easy to replace compared to the normal factory mounts costing over 5 .times the price just to renew the normal mounts and
still being a bit soft.
By using a more rigid mount that will still give a certain amount of flex must be a good thing on outboard engines ?
with say the top mounts on the (1992 0nwards) OMC triple engines, once the rubber is removed from the original mount its a simple case of pressing in the bushes,
these can be pushed in by hand with the half each side type or pressed in by machine for the full bush type, the inserts are stainless tubes so also less chance of rotting.
ive noticed that the bushes in the uk range from around £10 for two , so that's the top mount on an outboard such as the omc triple complete and in
the USA prices for these are from around $10 upwards for the pair depending on your choice of colour and stiffness.
considering these bushes take the strain of rally cross vehicles suspension , I would thought that outboard engine mounting with these would be good.
is there any valid reason not to use such a bush as this type ?
I have looked around and seen these bushes taking so much strain and torture from all sorts of vehicles, even heavy duty trucks are now having these fitted
instead of the usual cheapo rubber from the factory.
I could ofcourse be very wrong and maybe these have been tried and tested to be not good for outboard engines for a very good reason, but I cant see any drawbacks to these
and being as the sizes needed are on the shelf in 90% of motorsports shops and very cheap to buy, to me makes good sense.
anyone else ever tried these and got good or bad results ?
I know some people have gone to the extreme and fitted solid mounts, but this just puts the stresses on other places , I.E the transom etc.
some don't like the idea of the solid metal mounts causing gearbox failures due to stress cracks being caused by complete solid mounts too.
What if you were to use polyurethane bushes like those fitted to customised vehicles and off road extreme vehicles ?
The polybushes come in all different grades of stiffness from soft to almost solid as a rock and will last 10 times that of the omc/brp mounts.
Lots of the big customised inboard engine use the polyurethane due to it being so much better and long lasting.
The size of the bushes that will fit the OMC triple just happens to be a size that is very common all around the world, and very cheap !!!!!
salt water don't destroy the polyurethane they also don't mind the heat or extremes of pressure.
some of the benefits of this type of mount would be the resistance to petroleum fuels and hydrocarbon fuels ,its low compression set, good abrasion resistance
good tensile strength and high rigidity, good ozone and weather restance and even dry heat tolerance to over 100 degree C.
so would this not be an ideal application for high performance outboard engine mounts ?
the price of this type of mount is extremely cheap and easy to replace compared to the normal factory mounts costing over 5 .times the price just to renew the normal mounts and
still being a bit soft.
By using a more rigid mount that will still give a certain amount of flex must be a good thing on outboard engines ?
with say the top mounts on the (1992 0nwards) OMC triple engines, once the rubber is removed from the original mount its a simple case of pressing in the bushes,
these can be pushed in by hand with the half each side type or pressed in by machine for the full bush type, the inserts are stainless tubes so also less chance of rotting.
ive noticed that the bushes in the uk range from around £10 for two , so that's the top mount on an outboard such as the omc triple complete and in
the USA prices for these are from around $10 upwards for the pair depending on your choice of colour and stiffness.
considering these bushes take the strain of rally cross vehicles suspension , I would thought that outboard engine mounting with these would be good.
is there any valid reason not to use such a bush as this type ?
I have looked around and seen these bushes taking so much strain and torture from all sorts of vehicles, even heavy duty trucks are now having these fitted
instead of the usual cheapo rubber from the factory.
I could ofcourse be very wrong and maybe these have been tried and tested to be not good for outboard engines for a very good reason, but I cant see any drawbacks to these
and being as the sizes needed are on the shelf in 90% of motorsports shops and very cheap to buy, to me makes good sense.
anyone else ever tried these and got good or bad results ?