PDA

View Full Version : Water injection questions from the Quincy Forum



iwanajohnson
01-05-2007, 11:10 PM
alright guys, relatively new to high performance outboards. I was wondering if anyone woudl take the time to help out someone like me. I don't think It will be a problem because everyone on this site is extremely nice and helpful nomater what your boating experience that's Why I love this site so much. I was wondering if anyone could explane to me this water injection and how it worked. I've personally never heard of it but had kind of been thinking about something similar. I was thinking If I could test the weight vs. gain ratio, somehow get a tank of iced down or cold water and put in the boat, that way it would be able to be circulated around the engine to keep it cooler. was wondering if this would impact me in any way as far as positive or negative. I'm primarily goning to be drag racing so It's all about 1280ft. could someone tell me about this water injection and tell me if my idea's off or anygood. Also I deal with only 2 & 3 hold OMC motors, maily the 56ci tripple. was wondering if anyone had ever thought of filling in the spark holes on a tripple, having it drilled and threaded for 2 plugs, and running 6 spark plugs on a tripple with 6 coils, a mod 50 front and wicked port and exhaust work done. am I crazy or a genius. someone help me out.

Mark75H
01-06-2007, 10:13 AM
Water injection is pretty simple. In a tuned pipe the length of the pipe AND the speed of the sound waves are critically designed and built for a specific motor RPM. The pipe only increases power in a narrow rpm range ... maybe 1 thousand rpm on either side of the optimum. So if the pipe is built to give best increase power at 7,000, it works somewhat at 6,000 and 8,000, but is usless at 5,000 and 10,000 rpms. 10,000 rpm probably doesn't matter that much, but going thru the turns, the motor rpm probably does go to 5,000 or lower. Two things can be done to make the pipe work at lower rpm, the pipe can be longer .... or you can cool the exhaust down and slow down the sound wave to make the pipe work at a lower rpm.

Variable length expansion chambers are very popular on racing outboards, water injection is less popular, but has been used. Variable length is harder to set up on megaphone tuned exhaust, so water injection is usually tried instead on megaphones.

Tim Chance
01-07-2007, 02:46 PM
For iwannajohnson, here are some facts and opinions from my experience racing. 1. A redundant system with two ignitions. I think if that was a good idea that when I picked my new B Flathead up at 5th and State in Quincy, Illinois O.F.Christner would have had 4 spark plugs screwed into the cylinder head not two. 2. Running ice-cold water through the motor doesn't seem right to me. I think the motor runs best at high temperature when all the parts heat up and fit the best. Just cool it so it doesn't get so hot it sticks. 3. Water injection: Sam told you why and how it works. My experience is that I ran Ross Gibson's B Runabout (Desilva/Looper) with water injection a lot. He had a water tank, a battery, a pump and a door bell button by the throttle that you would push with your pinkey finger to activate it. Only problem was that Ross had bigger hands than me and I really had to stretch to reach it. It helped punch out of the corner but if I stayed on too long the motor would flatten out and lose power. This was with megaphones. I also tried it on my Konig with expansion chambers, but it didn't help that much and was a lot easier to just slide the pipes. Hope this adds a little bit.

Neil_M50D2
01-07-2007, 03:42 PM
The water injection into pipes is to cool the exhaust gasses thereby making the pipe look longer to the engine. (the speed of sound is slower in cooler air than hot air) Extending the pipe or injecting water out of the turn brings the pipe more into tune as a longer length is required at lower RPM.

We primarily used water injection coming off the beach just when the prop grabs a full load and the RPM goes from 13000 RPM to maybe 8000 RPM. Water-cooling the gases keeps the engine from loading with fuel at that low RPM. Once up and running we slide the pipe as needed out of the turns. The only other time water injection was nice is slow down without loading the engine. First slide the pipe back, still going too fast, injecting water will slow it a little more. Whereas, backing off the throttle tended to load the engine with fuel and suddenly poof, it shuts down. Pro racing, two speeds on and off.

Neil Bass

Tim Chance
01-08-2007, 08:38 AM
. Pro racing, two speeds on and off.

Neil Bass[/QUOTE]

Neil, I agree. I would tell newcomers: "It's not a throttle it's a switch."

franka
01-08-2007, 01:43 PM
Water injection is used in automotive racing. It's sprayed into the intake tract and it cools the intake charge so that the charge shrinks, becomes more dense, allowing more air and fuel to be injested each intake stroke. It works continuously and at all operating rpms very well.

It's also used in supercharged engines for the above reasons but also to prevent detonation.

Where in the Quincy was it injected? From the above posts it sounds like the exhaust stack. But I would not be surprised if it was in the intake tract and served the same function, to make the intake charge denser.

This is a great forum.

Tim Chance
01-08-2007, 02:21 PM
Water injection is used in automotive racing. It's sprayed into the intake tract and it cools the intake charge so that the charge shrinks, becomes more dense, allowing more air and fuel to be injested each intake stroke. It works continuously and at all operating rpms very well.

It's also used in supercharged engines for the above reasons but also to prevent detonation.

Where in the Quincy was it injected? From the above posts it sounds like the exhaust stack. But I would not be surprised if it was in the intake tract and served the same function, to make the intake charge denser.

This is a great forum.

Go the the Quincy Looper Pictures thread and look at the 2nd and 3rd photos that are of Bill Ela'a A motor. Bill only drove Ruanbouts and I drove that motor on a Hydro many-many times. The one photo from the rear shows fittings and hoses just in front of the springs on the exhaust elbows. That is the water injection. As a note I don't think Bill ever had the late model wide sweeping pipes on his A. About 1972 - 73, I sold Bill my B Quincy and my 13' Krier Runabout. I think those pipes must have come from my B. Incidentally Bill blew my old runabout over backwards at the Nationals in Hinton, WV, broke his arm and retired from the sport. I stood on shore and watched it blow over. Bill had never repainted and the boat still carried my number (Y-200) and it was a weird feeling. Another story about Bill and numbers in the late '60's Bill had put his numbers on with tape. Finally Charlotte Queen told him if he didn't paint his numbers she would disqualify him. Next race comes along and I say to Bill "You're gonna get disqualified, Charlotte said you had to paint your numbers."
Bill shook his head and grinned, and said "I painted the tape!."

franka
01-08-2007, 02:31 PM
Yes I see them. Thanks for the heads up on that.

Certainly someone, somewhere along the line must have tried water injection on the intake side. Has anyone seen or heard of that on an outboard? Seems almost anything anyone can think of has been tried at one time or another.

Thanks again.

Tim Chance
01-08-2007, 03:46 PM
Yes I see them. Thanks for the heads up on that.

Certainly someone, somewhere along the line must have tried water injection on the intake side. Has anyone seen or heard of that on an outboard? Seems almost anything anyone can think of has been tried at one time or another.

Thanks again.

Yeah, I've tried that a time or two too. It's called the roostertail from the guy in front of you. Most times the motor quits. Seriously, I have never heard of anyone using water injection on the intake side of a racing outboard. That doesn't mean it's never been tried, just that I've never heard of it.

Mark75H
01-08-2007, 03:59 PM
I doubt water injection into the intake tract would be a good idea on a 2 stroke ... water and bearings are not a good mix.

Alcohol fueled 2 strokes do get some of the same effect, esp since more alcohol is used than gas for correct mixture strength

franka
01-08-2007, 04:08 PM
I doubt water injection into the intake tract would be a good idea on a 2 stroke ... water and bearings are not a good mix.

Alcohol fueled 2 strokes do get some of the same effect, esp since more alcohol is used than gas for correct mixture strength

Those are good points. Four strokes don't have the bearing problem of a two stroke and the heavy alcohol mix would be more effective than a mist of water since the chill from evaporting alky would be greater than from an equal amount of water.

Thanks.

RichardKCMo
01-08-2007, 05:21 PM
. Pro racing, two speeds on and off.

Neil Bass

Neil, I agree. I would tell newcomers: "It's not a throttle it's a switch."[/QUOTE]

Tim, i read where Ron said that thing in your left hand is "'da' brakes", i had a discussion one time with Ted May about working on that poject at OMC , but damn i didn't take notes.
RichardKCMo

Neil_M50D2
01-08-2007, 05:23 PM
Racing alcohol ranges from about 92% to 96% fuel, the rest is water. We have adjusted the water content to adjust the lean-rich. Some water seems to be good, but too much is just wet. All it takes is very good hydrometer and some simple calculations to increase the water content up. Just remember that as the water content goes up the engine will run leaner. The rich-lean effect seems to be more important than the amount of water present.
Neil Bass

mercguy
01-08-2007, 06:25 PM
Racing alcohol ranges from about 92% to 96% fuel, the rest is water. We have adjusted the water content to adjust the lean-rich. Some water seems to be good, but too much is just wet. All it takes is very good hydrometer and some simple calculations to increase the water content up. Just remember that as the water content goes up the engine will run leaner. The rich-lean effect seems to be more important than the amount of water present.
Neil Bass

no wonder I only race stock and mod.........hydrometer, altitude, jetting, etc.........jeez...............just add gas and oil and go..........(for me)......LOL!!:D

franka
01-08-2007, 07:28 PM
Racing alcohol ranges from about 92% to 96% fuel, the rest is water. We have adjusted the water content to adjust the lean-rich. Some water seems to be good, but too much is just wet. All it takes is very good hydrometer and some simple calculations to increase the water content up. Just remember that as the water content goes up the engine will run leaner. The rich-lean effect seems to be more important than the amount of water present.
Neil Bass

That's very interesting. Is the water in the alky by choice, because its desireable or by unwanted chance from the alky absorbing it from the atmosphere? Alky has an afinity for water and absorbs it. We dumped 3-4 jerry cans full of alky into my Army tracked tank in Anchorage Alaska at fill up time to absorb the water that's in the gas and to prevent the water from freezing the gas lines.

On another subject...What kind of rpms did the good running Quincy's turn?
I heared everything from 9-10,000 rpm up to 14-15,000 rpms.

And what kinds of hp and/or torque figures were the D and F Quincy's pulling?

Thanks to all the guys here.

Neil_M50D2
01-08-2007, 08:38 PM
As soon as you open a new barrel of alcohol it absorbs moisture from the air. You may start with some real high percentage alcohol but by the end of the season it has dropped several percent. We found no real observable difference as long as the engine was jetted properly.

One race at Laurence lake Sid’s 500 was running too rich, so we hydro mitered some of our un-mixed fuel, ran some numbers then added ¼ cup water to lean the engine. Those around just looked with big eyes as I scooped ¼ cup directly from the lake to the fuel tank. It worked so well one of the competitions borrowed our hydrometer, but I do not think he new what to do with it.

Loved those days.
Neil Bass

franka
01-09-2007, 06:20 AM
As soon as you open a new barrel of alcohol it absorbs moisture from the air. You may start with some real high percentage alcohol but by the end of the season it has dropped several percent. We found no real observable difference as long as the engine was jetted properly.

One race at Laurence lake Sid’s 500 was running too rich, so we hydro mitered some of our un-mixed fuel, ran some numbers then added ¼ cup water to lean the engine. Those around just looked with big eyes as I scooped ¼ cup directly from the lake to the fuel tank. It worked so well one of the competitions borrowed our hydrometer, but I do not think he new what to do with it.

Loved those days.
Neil Bass

Stories like that is what made racing so much fun. I'll bet you can still picture the scene in great detail.

Tim Chance
01-11-2007, 02:17 PM
That's very interesting. Is the water in the alky by choice, because its desireable or by unwanted chance from the alky absorbing it from the atmosphere? Alky has an afinity for water and absorbs it. We dumped 3-4 jerry cans full of alky into my Army tracked tank in Anchorage Alaska at fill up time to absorb the water that's in the gas and to prevent the water from freezing the gas lines.

On another subject...What kind of rpms did the good running Quincy's turn?
I heared everything from 9-10,000 rpm up to 14-15,000 rpms.

And what kinds of hp and/or torque figures were the D and F Quincy's pulling?

Thanks to all the guys here.

I never had a tach on a Quincy but I think they turned about 9,000. I have seen 12,000 on a 4-cyl Konig.

More about water in the fuel. If you take a cup of raw methanol and throw it in the lake, it's clear, the water is clear and it just goes away. If you take that same cup of fuel with castor oil in it, as soon as it hits the water it turns white. Years-and-years ago with my Champion Hot Rod I had so much water in my fuel that it looked like I was pouring milk into the tank. I couldn't tell any difference, the motor didn't care.

Neil_M50D2
01-11-2007, 03:39 PM
Years-and-years ago with my Champion Hot Rod I had so much water in my fuel that it looked like I was pouring milk into the tank. I couldn't tell any difference, the motor didn't care.

We never tried that, but I have witnessed fuel run that milky. I am certain there is optimum moisture content for each engine. Would be an interesting experiment. However, the optimum would change with humidity and temperature. What a bag of worms, on second thought, just go racing.
Neil

Bill Van Steenwyk
01-21-2007, 01:05 AM
As Sam has mentioned in his earlier post the injection of water into the exhaust system cools the exaust gas and makes the engine think the pipe is longer than it really is while the water is being injected, giving you more bottom end/torque allowing you to pull a larger prop through the tough part of the power band, which is just when the boat breaks over on plane and puts a load on the engine. Larger prop at peak rpm equals more speed. I set a Kilo record in the mid 80'd at almost 91 MPH with a Yamato Model 80 on fuel with ONE 25mm CARB, using water injection as an aid to keep going after breaking over on plane and continue on with a larger than usual prop, thus achieving a speed that would not normally have been possible.

We used a ordinary aftermarket winshield washer system purchased at an auto supply store consisting of a plastic container that held about a quart of water and had a 12 volt motor mounted in the bottom of the container. Real neat and tidy and easy to mount. Ran two hoses, one to each collector pipe for each expansion chamber with a capability of inserting bing carb jets in the stand off pipe brazed in the collector so as to adjust the amount of water injected when you pushed the button. Used a small 12V battery from a portable VCR that weighed about a pound so very small and lightweight for power.

The Disadvantage: you needed a very good check valve in the line or two was better for safety as the motor would have a tendency at high RPM to suck water from the tank whether the switch was activated or not because of suction developed by the expansion chambers. In addition to slowing the motor down if this got into the pipe at the wrong time, you could actually suck the water vapor into the cylinders where it turned to steam immediately and the additional pressure of the steam plus normal combustion would crack pistons like walnuts. We destroyed several pistons before Harry ZAK finally figured out what was happening and got some decent check valves in the line to stop the problem.

Another disadvantage was that if you had it hooked up all the time, the tendency was to use it too often, sometimes mistaking a non-connected engine problem with loading the engine by thinking you had a little too large a prop on and trying to get the motor going when that was not the problem at all.

Short and sweet, for the right reasons it was good to have but easy to overuse if you weren't careful, and could be hard on the engine as mentioned.

John (Taylor) Gabrowski
11-18-2007, 07:52 PM
Arising from information on a water injection system for 2 stroke pipes I supplied and posted on British Anzani and Harrison (HRP) engine threads under Historical, it turns out that the system is from circa 1995 from some maker called "TA" *tm. As a result of this recent information it makes this system a lot newer than anything developed during the historical periods occupied by Harrison and Anzani. I therefore will no longer post anything more about that system on Harrsion or Anzani threads and will post new information acquired here where it belongs in its thread already started.

With that, the following diagrams are for the electrical and water flow diagrams for the system I acquired that is some 12 years old, made and distributed some where to 2 stroke enthusiasts back around 1995.

Enjoy the 2 technical diagrams of this TA water injection system for 2 stroke pipes. I am on a learning curve on this concept so there is little I can do to shed light on the TA system and what they were thinking and doing.