JohnsonM50
02-11-2007, 09:35 AM
A potentially good subject was started and went by the wayside, Id like to start it over. [to learn or inform]
Wood as a choice for kneeldowns has been It for many years, polyester & glass is too heavy as in strength to weight.
Composite boats have strength and lightness thats hard to beat however in weight limited classes is it better to put weight where you want it [lead] or run a rig close to required weight and have the drivers mobility factor play in? Would that be an advantage to a heavier driver?
In unrestricted weight racing composite is probably best. How is it in terms of service life and fatigue ?
Wood is something Ive learned a little about over the years. I see at the local races that by far most kneelers are wood and most of them are Sitka Spruce framed [exellent wood] and Okoume/Gaboon plywood skinned. Okoume has a good strength to weight ratio, its drawback is that its natural duability is low [it will rot rapidly]. It is reccomended that the construction method be epoxy saturation-all surfaces, all edges. Many of these boats use weight to make them legal, that brings me to think of another choice. Sapele/Sipo Its a little heavier and a little stronger and has twice the durability. Okoume = non durable, Sapele = moderatly durable.
Harbor Quality Products lists a rating scale.. very durable - 25+years, durable -15yrs, moderatly durable -10yrs, non durable -5yrs and perishable-less than 5. [The only listed wood at very durable is Teak] Sitka Spruce rates well as light, strong and moderatly durable as well as Honduran Mahogany is shown to be a little heavier than Sitka, not as strong [but close] it is however rated as durable making it a good transome choice.
With so many variables to consider the similarities we see in the boats today must be for good reasons. I have an interest in building good quality boats in the future and welcome thoughts, experienced or new.
Wood as a choice for kneeldowns has been It for many years, polyester & glass is too heavy as in strength to weight.
Composite boats have strength and lightness thats hard to beat however in weight limited classes is it better to put weight where you want it [lead] or run a rig close to required weight and have the drivers mobility factor play in? Would that be an advantage to a heavier driver?
In unrestricted weight racing composite is probably best. How is it in terms of service life and fatigue ?
Wood is something Ive learned a little about over the years. I see at the local races that by far most kneelers are wood and most of them are Sitka Spruce framed [exellent wood] and Okoume/Gaboon plywood skinned. Okoume has a good strength to weight ratio, its drawback is that its natural duability is low [it will rot rapidly]. It is reccomended that the construction method be epoxy saturation-all surfaces, all edges. Many of these boats use weight to make them legal, that brings me to think of another choice. Sapele/Sipo Its a little heavier and a little stronger and has twice the durability. Okoume = non durable, Sapele = moderatly durable.
Harbor Quality Products lists a rating scale.. very durable - 25+years, durable -15yrs, moderatly durable -10yrs, non durable -5yrs and perishable-less than 5. [The only listed wood at very durable is Teak] Sitka Spruce rates well as light, strong and moderatly durable as well as Honduran Mahogany is shown to be a little heavier than Sitka, not as strong [but close] it is however rated as durable making it a good transome choice.
With so many variables to consider the similarities we see in the boats today must be for good reasons. I have an interest in building good quality boats in the future and welcome thoughts, experienced or new.